Are Skin Fiducials Comparable to Bone Fiducials for Registration When Planning Navigation-assisted Musculoskeletal Tumor Resections in a Cadaveric Simulated Tumor Model?

CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, skin fiducial markers were easy to identify on the skin surface of the cadaver model and on CT images used to plan margins. This technique appears to be an accurate way to plan margins in this model, but it needs to be tested thoroughly in patients to determine if it may be a better clinical approach than with bone fiducials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The margins obtained using skin fiducials and bone fiducials for registration were similar and comparable in this pilot study with a very small effect size. Boundaries of the simulated tumors were not violated in any resections. Skin fiducials are easier to identify than bone fiducials (anatomic landmarks). If future clinical studies demonstrate that margins obtained using skin fiducials for registration are similar to margins obtained with anatomical landmarks, the use of navigation with skin fiducials instead of bone fiducials may be advantageous. This technique may decrease the surgeon's time used to plan for and localize registration points and offer an alternative registration technique, providing the surgeon with other registration approaches. PMID: 31764337 [PubMed - in process]
Source: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research - Category: Orthopaedics Authors: Tags: Clin Orthop Relat Res Source Type: research