Comparison of 125 Iodine Seed-Loaded Stents with Different Diameters in Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

AbstractCurrently, there are no recommendations or guidelines concerning the preferred diameter of esophageal stents for palliative treatment, owing to the lack of adequate evidence. We therefore conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate whether 18  mm stents would achieve a similar function of dysphagia relief with fewer complications and longer survival compared to 20 mm stents. Esophageal cancer patients who underwent 125 iodine seed-loaded stent placement with a diameter of either 18 mm (n = 103) or 20 mm (n = 54) were included at five hospitals in China. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to control potential confounding factors and bias that are inherent in a retrospective study. The primary endpoint was dysphagia relief. Stent-related complications and over all survival were assessed as the secondary endpoints. In the IPTW-adjusted analysis, no significant difference was found in the dysphagia score between the two groups either at 1 week after stent placement or at the last week before death. Despite a comparable rate of overall complications, there was a significantly lower incidence of severe retrosternal pain (15.4% vs. 32.7%,p = 0.013) and a trend toward longer survival (median survival, 176 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 144 to 209] vs. 109 days [92 to 126],p = 0.057) in the 18 mm group. An irradiated stent with a diameter of 18 mm showed a similar outcome of dysphagia relief to that ach...
Source: Dysphagia - Category: Speech-Language Pathology Source Type: research