Federal Judge Rejects Motion to Dismiss Lawsuit Challenging Constitutionality of Idaho Law Voiding Pregnant Women ’s Living Wills
A federal court today rejected a motion by State of Idaho
defendants to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a state
statute that invalidates a person’s advance directive if they have been
diagnosed as pregnant.
The Court determined that the Plaintiffs may proceed
with their lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the statute. The lawsuit, Almerico et al. v.
State of Idaho et al, was filed in May 2018 by Compassion & Choices and
Legal Voice on behalf of four Idaho women.
The outcome of the suit could have
repercussions for similar laws in nine states: Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, South
Carolina, Texas, Utah and
Wisconsin. Washington
repealed a similar law in the 1980s.
Idaho’s Medical Consent and
Natural Death Act
recognizes: “...the fundamental right of competent persons to control the
decisions relating to the rendering of their medical care, including the
decision to have life-sustaining procedures withheld or withdrawn.” But the law states that if a
person has “been diagnosed as pregnant, this Directive shall have no force
during the course of [their] pregnancy.”This law
disregards a person’s wishes for the care they want or do not want to receive.
For this reason, Compassion & Choices and Legal Voice argue that Idaho’s
law violates people’s constitutional rights to legal equality and to direct
their own medical care.
All four
plaintiffs are wome...
Source: blog.bioethics.net - Category: Medical Ethics Authors: Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD Tags: Health Care syndicated Source Type: blogs
More News: Babies | Blogging | Children | Health Management | Lawsuits | Legislation | Medical Ethics | Politics | Pregnancy | Science | USA Health | Women