Ten-Year Treatment Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy vs External Beam Radiation Therapy vs Brachytherapy for 1,503 Patients with Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
To compare 10-year oncologic treatment outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) vs external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) vs brachytherapy (BT) for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer (IRPC).
ConclusionEBRT + BT was associated with a significantly better prostate CSS compared with surgery or EBRT. EBRT alone was inferior to surgery by OS.
In this study we evaluate the lesion detection efficacy of18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in patients with BCR and determine the detection efficacy as a function of their PSA value.MethodsA total of 248 consecutive patients were evaluated and underwent scanning with18F-DCFPyL PET/CT for BCR between November 2016 and 2018 in two hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were examined after radical prostatectomy (52%), external-beam radiation therapy (42%) or brachytherapy (6%). Imaging was performed 120 min after injection of a median dose of 311 MBq18F-DCFPyL.ResultsIn 214 out of 248 PET/CT scans (86.3%), at least one lesion sug...
CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we did not observe higher rate of BCR after TRT for nonmetastatic CaP patients after definitive local therapy. Based on these data, others and we have outlined a phase I/II trial assessing the safety and benefits of TRT in select men with secondary symptomatic hypogonadism who have no active disease after definitive local CaP therapy with curative intent. PMID: 31296421 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Publication date: Available online 4 June 2019Source: European UrologyAuthor(s): Sebastian Berg, Alexander Cole, Quoc-Dien Trinh
Publication date: Available online 23 May 2019Source: European UrologyAuthor(s): Michael Froehner, Christian Thomas
CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant difference in survival between RP and EBRT+BT. EBRT and brachytherapy had higher mortality, respectively, compared to RP. When including only radiotherapy patients who received ADT and, in the case of EBRT, a total dose ≥ 7920 cGy, there was no statistically significant difference in survival when comparing RP to EBRT or brachytherapy. These findings should be prospectively studied. PMID: 31109836 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Cancer, still presenting one of the major challenges in modern healthcare, leads to more than 8.8 million deaths annually. While the main treatment options include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, increasing attention is given to brachytherapy in e.g. the treatment of prostate cancer. Advantages of brachytherapy, as compared to radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy, lie in the much higher radiation doses which can be given to the tumour tissue whilst sparing healthy tissue.
ConclusionssRP was safe, feasible, and effective using either an open or robot-assisted approach, in experienced hands. Age, preoperative clinical stage, NS procedure, and pathological GS were linked with BCR after sRP.
ConclusionS-HIFU and S-RP could both be considered valuable LST options for patients with radiation-recurrent nonmetastatic PCa with sufficient life expectancy. S-RP is associated with more pad-dependent patients at 12 months.
Publication date: Available online 19 January 2019Source: European UrologyAuthor(s): Alexander P. Cole, Quoc-Dien Trinh