Libet's intention reports are invalid: A replication of Dominik et al. (2017).

Libet's intention reports are invalid: A replication of Dominik et al. (2017).
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Oct 31;77:102836
Authors: Sanford P, Lawson AL, King AN, Major M
Abstract
In the "Libet experiment" the onset of movement-related brain activity preceded the reported time of the conscious intention to move, suggesting that conscious intention may not play a role in initiating voluntary movements (Libet, Gleason, Wright, & Pearl, 1983). Dominik et al. (2017) provided evidence that the intention reports employed in the Libet experiment, which Libet et al. (1983) found to precede movement reports, are invalid. In the study by Dominik et al., intention reports preceded movement reports only when participants had prior experience making movement reports. Individuals without such experience reported intention around the same time as movement. These findings suggest that Libet's intention reports do not reflect experiences of intention, but, rather, inferences based on prior experience with movement reports. Our study replicated the core findings of Dominik et al. We argue that Libet's intention reports are invalid and explore the phenomenology of intention in the Libet experiment.
PMID: 31678778 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Source: Consciousness and Cognition - October 30, 2019 Category: Neurology Authors: Sanford P, Lawson AL, King AN, Major M Tags: Conscious Cogn Source Type: research