[Arterial closure devices. What device for which clinical situation?].

[Arterial closure devices. What device for which clinical situation?]. Radiologe. 2013 Mar;53(3):230-45 Authors: Treitl M, Eberhardt KM, Maxien D, Behrends B, Reiser MF Abstract CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Access site complications after endovascular catheterization sometimes require open surgery and negatively impair safety, patient comfort and reimbursement. Increasing numbers of procedures and patients with multiple anticoagulants as well as cost pressure explain the demand for an immediate and stable access site closure. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Manual compression followed by compression bandage and bed rest for 4-24 h is still the gold standard but is unable to prevent access site complications in all cases. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Arterial vascular closure devices allow immediate and stable closure of the puncture channel either by suture or by implantation of occluding foreign bodies or gluing fluids. PERFORMANCE: The safety has been proven in several clinical trials. The main advantage lies in closing large lumen access sites without surgery and in patients treated with multiple anticoagulants as well as in outpatient procedures. ACHIEVEMENTS: They have become a valuable supplement to the interventional arsenal. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The physician, however, has to decide between different systems and mechanisms with respect to patient constitution, selected access vessel and level of calcification and diameter. Furthermore, ...
Source: Der Radiologe - Category: Radiology Authors: Tags: Radiologe Source Type: research