Claims-based cardiovascular outcome identification for clinical research: Results from seven large randomized cardiovascular clinical trials

ConclusionsClaims- vs. site-based (+CEC) follow-up identified similar overall cardiovascular event rates, despite meaningful differences in the events detected. Randomized treatment effects were similar using the two methods, suggesting claims data could be used to support clinical research leveraging routinely-collected data. This approach may lead to more effective evidence generation, synthesis, and appraisal of medical products and inform the strategic approaches toward the National Evaluation System for Health Technology.
Source: American Heart Journal - Category: Cardiology Source Type: research