SILVERSTEIN v. ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: MOTION TO PROHIBIT COMMENTARY ABOUT THIS LITIGATION TO ANY PUBLIC CONTEXT: Do computers have more rights than patients?

Herein is an issue of potential Internet censorship and/or attempted prior restraint of the rights of a citizen to express him/herself freely:At my post "Hospital defense maliciousness, aided and abetted by attorneys who ignore the ABA and Pennsylvania's Ethical Rules of Conduct Regarding "Candor Towards the Tribunal" I wrote about how a defense attorney in a case I unfortunately am substitute plaintiff in, that involving EHRs and the injury and the death of my mother, violated the requirement under the Code of Conduct of lawyers to exhibit candor before the tribunal, and perhaps 18 Pa.C.S. ยง4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities as well.As also mentioned, the lawfirm was displeased, but did not respond to my offer to consider amending any factually erroneous assertions at that post.Now here is their response:4/19/2013MotionBY ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MOTION TO PROHIBIT COMMENTARY ABOUT THIS LITIGATION TO ANY PUBLIC CONTEXT WITH MEMORANDUM OF LAW WITH SERVICE ON 04/19/2013The Motion text is here in PDF (it is a public document available to anyone on the Montgomery County, PA Prothonotary website).The court has yet to rule on this new motion and Substitute Plaintiff's (me) replies.I will, of course, abide by the Court's decision.First: I note that I have been writing about issues of court process, not the substance of the case's actual issues.   I think citizens have a right to know about process in their courtrooms.  I am also Joe Public...
Source: Health Care Renewal - Category: Health Medicine and Bioethics Commentators Tags: Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman Goggin healthcare IT risk Internet censorship Abington Memorial Hospital prior restraint Stroud v. Abington Memorial Hospital Source Type: blogs