Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve guided complete revascularization versus infarct related artery only revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease
Background
Multivessel coronary artery disease is found in 30–50% of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with adverse outcomes. It is not yet clear if outcomes are improved by utilizing fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of noninfarct related artery (non-IRA) along with primary PCI.
Methods and results
To evaluate this, we performed a metanalysis of published randomized controlled trials by performing systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, with total of 1633 patients; 689 underwent FFR-guided complete revascularization and 944 underwent IRA only revascularization. FFR-guided PCI of non-IRA along with primary PCI led to significant reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, MI and repeat revascularization) compared to PCI of IRA only [odds ratio (OR) = 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.42–0.72; P
Source: Coronary Artery Disease - Category: Cardiology Tags: STEMI Source Type: research
More News: Angioplasty | Cardiology | Cardiovascular | Coronary Angioplasty | Heart | Heart Attack | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | Study