Firefighter: Aqueous Foam Defendant's Dismissal Argument Is 'Without Merit'

COLUMBUS, Ohio - A firefighter who claims that he has been injured as a result of exposure to aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) used to fight chemical fires, which contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), on June 10 filed a brief in Ohio federal court contending that the motion to dismiss filed by one of the defendants should be denied because its argument is "without merit" (Kevin Hardwick v. 3M Company, et al., No. 18-1185, S.D. Ohio).
Source: LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Toxic Torts Legal News - Category: Medical Law Source Type: news