Reply to comments on “The association between brain morphological development and the quality of general movements”

I appreciate the comments of Saini et al. on our paper. As they mentioned, the longitudinal general movements assessments (GMA) is more informative than the cross-sectional, and GMA in fidgety period is the most useful for predicting cerebral palsy.
Source: Brain and Development - Category: Neurology Authors: Tags: Opinion Source Type: research