Radiology reporting of low-grade glioma growth underestimates tumor expansion

ConclusionsGiven accumulating evidence that LGG volume and growth are prognostic factors, there is a need for objective lesion measurement. Current radiological reporting workflows fail to appreciate and communicate the true expansion of LGGs. While volumetric analysis remains the gold standard for assessment of growth, careful diametric measurements in three dimensions may be an acceptable alternative.
Source: Acta Neurochirurgica - Category: Neurosurgery Source Type: research