The First Amendment Allows You to Draw Your Own Conclusion on Same-Sex Marriage

Earlier this year inMasterpiece Cakeshop, the Supreme Court contended with the issue of whether cake-baking is protected speech under the First Amendment, and thus whether a Christian baker could refuse to design a wedding cake for a same-sex ceremony. The Court ended up punting on the case ’s major questions, but now the Arizona Supreme Court is facing a similar issue, this time with calligraphers instead of bakers.Artists Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski are practicing Christians who own and operate Brush& Nib, an art studio in Phoenix, Arizona. In addition to designing wedding invitations using calligraphy, they produce recreations of wedding vows and other custom artistic works. Phoenix ’s public accommodation law would require them to design invitations and vows for every ceremony—even those that conflict with their sincerely held faith. The city imposes draconian punishments for failing to comply with this law; Joanna and Breanna could face fines of $2,500 per day, or up to s ix months in jail. It seems that in Phoenix, Christian artists who oppose same-sex marriage must choose between practicing their faith and running a business if they want to avoid both bankruptcy and jail time.Cato of course has a long history of supporting both gay rights and the First Amendment. We were the only organization in the entire country to have filed briefs supporting the petitioners in bothMasterpiece Cakeshop and the marriage cases that ended inObergefell v. Hodges(2015). Now, join...
Source: Cato-at-liberty - Category: American Health Authors: Source Type: blogs