New Cato Report: A Border Wall Won ’t Stop Drug Smuggling—Marijuana Legalization Has

President Trump has repeatedly cited drug smuggling as a reason to build a wall along the Southern border. Butmy new Cato policy analysis shows that, if stopping drug smuggling is the goal, a border wall is about the worst possible investment. Here are a few of the main findings:Hundreds of miles of border fences built from 2003 to 2009 had no effect on marijuana smuggling.Marijuana legalization starting in 2014 has cut marijuana smuggling between ports of entry (i.e. where a wall would go) 78 percent from 114 pounds per agent in 2013 to just 25 pounds per agent in 2018.  Since marijuana is the primary drug smuggled between ports of entry, the total value ofall drugs seized by the average Border Patrol agent fell 70 percent from 2013 to 2018.As a result, the average inspector at ports of entry made drug seizures that werethree times more valuable than those made by Border Patrol in 2018. In 2013 —prior to legalization—the average Border Patrol agent made more valuable seizures.By weight, the average port inspector seized 8 times more cocaine, 17 times more fentanyl, 23 times more methamphetamine, and 36 times more heroin than the average Border Patrol agent seized at the physical border in early 2018.The best proxy measure for changes in drug smuggling is the amount of drugs seized by Border Patrol. To control for enforcement levels, the paper looks at seizuresper agent. From 2003 to 2013, the rate of seizures per agent was virtually constant, even as the number of agent...
Source: Cato-at-liberty - Category: American Health Authors: Source Type: blogs