Executive Committee Meetings, July 10, 2018

Discussion centered on confusion that might occur if parallel conversations take place in the original board community and a more open forum as a result of replicating content to make it available more broadly. Another potential issue: members could copy & paste or do screenshots and share outside the SPM community. We’ll have to have a clear code of conduct for SPM Connect if we open the board discussions to all members. Sue summed up the discussion: two decision points: 1) Yes/No go forward and 2) how to handle the archive, which may include some sensitive information. Other issues: etiquette –need someone to create the code of conduct and monitor Connect. Peter is not worried about having that ready. Suggestions for start date: Danny proposes we start & announce at conference in October. Per John Grohol’s suggestion, we will frame this as a time-limited test to assess whether opening up board discussions will increase participation in our initiatives. Survey (Sue Woods, Judy Danielson) Sue provided some follow-up information on the member survey. First of all, we ran into more bumps than expected. In brief, we ended up with 43 completed surveys out of 463 that were sent out. Only about 60 were opened. Since only 43 out of 463 were completed, we can expect there was some bias in responses. With respect to the question about the role of the survey responder, patient advocate was listed most often. There were some providers and some health technology folks. The ...
Source: Society for Participatory Medicine - Category: General Medicine Authors: Tags: Executive Minutes Executive Committee Meetings Executive Committee Minutes Source Type: news