Company: Allowing Plaintiff's Evidence At This Stage Would Be 'Highly Prejudicial'

ASHEVILLE, N.C. - A company sued for allegedly contaminating a man's groundwater supply filed a brief on Oct. 13 in North Carolina federal court, arguing that the plaintiff's "newly disclosed evidence and expert opinion" should be excluded because it would be "highly prejudicial" to allow that evidence to be admitted at this stage of the litigation (Kent Stahle v. CTS Corporation, No. 14-48, W.D. N.C.).

Source: LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Toxic Torts Legal News - November 8, 2017 Category: Medical Law Source Type: news