“Quackery” that saves lives

I’m used to being a target of mainstream medicine. I can’t even count the number of times I’ve been called a “quack.”  Let me give you just one example… For decades I’ve been treating my patients with a proven therapy. The FDA approved it way back in 1953. I use it to help my patients detox from mercury, lead, cadmium and other heavy metals. In fact, more than 100,000 people get this therapy every year in the U.S. But mainstream doctors still laugh at the idea of this treatment and think it’s pure bunk. I’m talking about intravenous (IV) chelation. Even though I’ve been mocked, I’ve never stopped offering it to my patients. I can’t ethically abandon a treatment that works wonders. I’ve found it’s especially effective for my diabetic patients with heart disease.  And now the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is finally starting to come around. Let me explain… About 15 years ago, a Harvard cardiologist named Dr. Gervasio Lamas set out to prove chelation was quackery. In 2002, he launched a study of more than 1,700 heart attack survivors. It involved 134 research sites. The patients were randomly assigned to receive IV chelation or a placebo. After seven years, Dr. Lamas was shocked by his own results. Compared to placebo, patients who received chelation had a 26% lower risk of heart complications. That included things like a second heart attack, stroke or bypass surgery.1 The results for ...
Source: Al Sears, MD Natural Remedies - Category: Complementary Medicine Authors: Tags: Anti-Aging Health Heart Health Men's Health Women's Health Source Type: news