A longitudinal assessment of adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening recommendations among women with and without intellectual disability

Publication date: July 2017 Source:Preventive Medicine, Volume 100 Author(s): Xinling Xu, Suzanne W. McDermott, Joshua R. Mann, James W. Hardin, Chelsea B. Deroche, Dianna D. Carroll, Elizabeth A. Courtney-Long Each year in the United States, about 4000 deaths are attributed to cervical cancer, and over 40,000 deaths are attributed to breast cancer (U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2015). The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of full, partial, and no screening for breast and cervical cancer among women with and without intellectual disability (ID) who are within the age group for screening recommended by the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), while accounting for changes in recommendations over the study period. Women with ID and an age matched comparison group of women without ID were identified using merged South Carolina Medicaid and Medicare files from 2000 to 2010. The sample consisted of 9406 and 16,806 women for mammography screening and Papanicolaou (Pap) testing adherence, respectively. We estimated multinomial logistic regression models and determined that women with ID were significantly less likely than women without ID to be fully adherent compared to no screening with mammography recommendations (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.72), and Pap testing recommendations (AOR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.16–0.19). For the 70% of women with ID for whom we had residential information, those who lived in a...
Source: Preventive Medicine - Category: Global & Universal Source Type: research