Diagnostic performance of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in patients with mediastinal and coexistent endobronchial or peripheral lesions

Abstract: To compare the performance of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with conventional endobronchial biopsy (EBB) or transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) in patients with mediastinal, and coexisting endobronchial or peripheral lesions. Retrospective review of records of patients undergoing diagnostic EBUS-TBNA and conventional bronchoscopy in 2014. A total of 74 patients had mediastinal, and coexisting endobronchial or peripheral lesions. The detection rate of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lesion>1 cm in short axis, EBB for visible exophytic type of endobronchial lesion, and TBLB for peripheral lesion with bronchus sign were 71%, 75%, and 86%, respectively. In contrast, the detection rate of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lesion ≤1 cm in short axis, EBB for mucosal hyperemia type of endobronchial lesion, and TBLB for peripheral lesion without bronchus sign were 25%, 63%, and 38%, and improved to 63%, 88%, and 62% respectively by adding EBB or TBLB to EBUS-TBNA, and EBUS-TBNA to EBB or TBLB. Postprocedure bleeding was significantly more common in patients undergoing EBB and TBLB 8 (40%) versus convex probe EBUS-TBNA 2 patients (2.7%, P = 0.0004). EBUS-TBNA is a safer single diagnostic technique compared with EBB or TBLB in patients with mediastinal lesion of>1 cm in size, and coexisting exophytic type of endobronchial lesion, or peripheral lesion with bronchus sign. However, it requires combining with EBB or TBLB ...
Source: Medicine - Category: Internal Medicine Tags: Research Article: Observational Study Source Type: research