The Legal Implications of Report Back in Household Exposure Studies

Conclusions: Researchers should still report back to participants who want to see their results, but they should disclose the risks of obtaining the information as part of the informed consent process.

Citation: Goho SA. 2016. The legal implications of report back in household exposure studies. Environ Health Perspect 124:1662–1670; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP187
Address correspondence to S.A. Goho, Suite 4119, 6 Everett St., Cambridge, MA 02138 USA. Telephone: [phone]. E-mail: [e-mail]
This research derives from an idea developed by J. Brody and R. Rudel. P. Brown, J. Brody, R. Rudel, and W. Jacobs provided feedback on previous drafts.
This research was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (R01ES017514-02).
The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Received: 8 September 2015
Revised: 18 December 2015
Accepted: 29 April 2016
Published: 6 May 2016
Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [e-mail]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

Introduction

RelatedÂ...

Source: EHP Research - November 1, 2016 Category: Environmental Health Authors: Web Admin Tags: Reviews November 2016 Source Type: research