Advancing Alternative Analysis: Integration of Decision Science

Conclusions: We advance four recommendations: (1) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; (2) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; (3) supporting transdisciplinary research; and (4) supporting education and outreach efforts.

This EHP Advance Publication article has been peer-reviewed, revised, and accepted for publication. EHP Advance Publication articles are completely citable using the DOI number assigned to the article. This document will be replaced with the copyedited and formatted version as soon as it is available. Through the DOI number used in the citation, you will be able to access this document at each stage of the publication process.
Citation: Malloy TF, Zaunbrecher VM, Batteate C, Blake A, Carroll WF Jr., Corbett CJ, Hansen SF, Lempert R, Linkov I, McFadden R, Moran KD, Olivetti E, Ostrom N, Romero M, Schoenung J, Seager T, Sinsheimer P, Thayer K. Advancing Alternative Analysis: Integration of Decision Science. Environ Health Perspect; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP483
Received: 16 December 2015
Revised: 19 September 2016
Accepted: 19 September 2016
Published: 28 October 2016
Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the comp...

Source: EHP Research - October 28, 2016 Category: Environmental Health Authors: Web Admin Tags: Review Source Type: research