In our study, despite the longer intubation times in group G, the haemodynamic response was significantly lower in this group. It is believed that especially in cases with vital requirement of haemodynamic stability, the GlideScope video laryngoscope would be safer to employ. < /p > < /span >..."> In our study, despite the longer intubation times in group G, the haemodynamic response was significantly lower in this group. It is believed that especially in cases with vital requirement of haemodynamic stability, the GlideScope video laryngoscope would be safer to employ. < /p > < /span >..." /> In our study, despite the longer intubation times in group G, the haemodynamic response was significantly lower in this group. It is believed that especially in cases with vital requirement of haemodynamic stability, the GlideScope video laryngoscope would be safer to employ. < /p > < /span >..." />

Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy and Macintosh laryngoscope in ear –nose and throat surgery

Conclusion < /h3 > < p class= " a-plus-plus " > In our study, despite the longer intubation times in group G, the haemodynamic response was significantly lower in this group. It is believed that especially in cases with vital requirement of haemodynamic stability, the GlideScope video laryngoscope would be safer to employ. < /p > < /span >
Source: Irish Journal of Medical Science - Category: Journals (General) Source Type: research