In defense of medical societies – especially ACP

A recent comment attacked medical societies as being impotent on several issues.  The commenter clearly expects these societies to work quick visible changes.  Here is my take: My recent leadership role at ACP makes this answer biased, but I believe your expectations of medical societies are harsh. These societies are not impotent, but they are also not potent enough to drive policies. I can speak best for ACP. Let’s take your concerns: Defining quality Please read the ACP’s performance measurement evaluations – https://www.acponline.org/clinical-information/performance-measures These evaluations are quite thoughtful and include the reasons that most measures are inadequate. ACP started doing this many years ago, but no one is listening. ACP is trying to influence MACRA, and at least provides information for physicians to pick their own performance measures. Midlevels and what training is needed to practice medicine This is a complex issue. ACP’s policy on clinical teams does make the point very clearly. EMR absurdities – have you read the ACP’s excellent paper on the problems with EMRs? Meaningful use – ACP has helped convince the end of meaningful use. Medical societies cannot be as strident as we can in the blogosphere or the twitterverse. They must work through the system. They do accomplish a great deal. Often they do not make big news, but I am proud to be a member of ACP. The organization has the best interests of int...
Source: DB's Medical Rants - Category: Internal Medicine Authors: Tags: Medical Rants Source Type: blogs