The Impact of Sparse Follow-up on Marginal Structural Models for Time-to-Event Data.

The Impact of Sparse Follow-up on Marginal Structural Models for Time-to-Event Data. Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 20; Authors: Mojaverian N, Moodie EE, Bliu A, Klein MB Abstract The impact of risk factors on the amount of time taken to reach an endpoint is a common parameter of interest. Hazard ratios are often estimated using a discrete-time approximation, which works well when the by-interval event rate is low. However, if the intervals are made more frequent than the observation times, missing values will arise. We investigated common analytical approaches, including available-case (AC) analysis, last observation carried forward (LOCF), and multiple imputation (MI), in a setting where time-dependent covariates also act as mediators. We generated complete data to obtain monthly information for all individuals, and from the complete data, we selected "observed" data by assuming that follow-up visits occurred every 6 months. MI proved superior to LOCF and AC analyses when only data on confounding variables were missing; AC analysis also performed well when data for additional variables were missing completely at random. We applied the 3 approaches to data from the Canadian HIV-Hepatitis C Co-infection Cohort Study (2003-2014) to estimate the association of alcohol abuse with liver fibrosis. The AC and LOCF estimates were larger but less precise than those obtained from the analysis that employed MI. PMID: 26589708 [PubMed - as su...
Source: Am J Epidemiol - Category: Epidemiology Authors: Tags: Am J Epidemiol Source Type: research