Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review

Conclusions The RE-AIM framework has been employed in a variety of populations and settings for the planning, delivery, and evaluation of behavioral interventions. This review highlights inconsistencies in the degree to which authors reported each dimension in its entirety as well as inaccuracies in reporting indicators within each dimension. Further, there are few interventions that aim to improve outcomes related to reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance.
Source: Systematic Reviews - Category: Global & Universal Source Type: research