What is effective in the therapeutic process? a round table discussion.
Discussion on "What is effective in the therapeutic process?" was held at the 1956 Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. It was moderated by Bella S. Van Bark, M.D., who outlined in her introduction the existence of a variety of opinions on what kind of help leads to effective therapy. Effectiveness is defined in terms of personality change and growth. Dr. Van Bark acknowledged that different theoretical approaches would consider different factors of primary importance in the effectiveness of the process: doctor-patient relationship; personality of the therapist; the activation of the constructive forces in the patient; diminishing of the destructive forces in the patient. She focused the discussion by posing some poignant questions regarding the forces at play in the therapeutic process. PMID: 26177760 [PubMed - in process]
Authors: Westwood S Abstract With increasing visibility of older lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people, there is an urgent need to understand abuse in their lives. This is an under-researched area, which this scoping study (based on a literature review and a small subset of data taken from a larger project) serves to demonstrate. The content of this article formed the basis of a paper presented at a workshop on 'LGBT Elder Abuse' held at Keele University(UK) in 2017, convened and chaired by the author. It considers LGBT elder abuse in terms of polyvictimisation, intersectionality and the abuse of power. Th...
Authors: Lhermite A, Munoz Sastre MT, Sorum PC, Mullet E Abstract The views of laypeople and professionals (nurses, occupational therapists, psychologists, and physicians) on the capacity to make informed decisions of elderly people with depression or dementia were examined. Participants were presented with vignettes created by varying the levels of three factors: (a) the type of decision (e.g., agreeing to surgery), (b) the health problem (e.g., slight depression), and (c) the availability of social support. Through cluster analysis, four different positions were found. Seventeen percent of the participants consid...
CONCLUSION:: Reasons for DRF are multifactorial. Preventive strategies with an emphasis on environmental and behavioural factor modifications are likely to decrease the number of DRF. PMID: 30452300 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Øyvind Gløersen, Thomas Losnegard, Anders Malthe-Sørenssen, Dag Kristian Dysthe, Matthias Gilgien
Thiago Montes Fidale, Hanna Karen Moreira Antunes, Leonardo Roever, Alexandre Gon çalves, Guilherme Morais Puga, Romeu Paulo Martins Silva, Fernando Nazário de Resende, Fernanda Rodrigues de Souza, Beatriz Montes Fidale, Frederico Balbino Lizardo, Elmiro Santos Resende
Mohamed M. Refaey, Dapeng Li
Rong Jiahuan, Su Wenhao, Guan Xiaofan, Shi Wei, Zha Shanjie, He Maolong, Wang Haifeng, Liu Guangxu
Maria Bogdanova, Aleksandra Kostina, Katarina Zihlavnikova Enayati, Arsenii Zabirnyk, Anna Malashicheva, K åre-Olav Stensløkken, Gareth John Sullivan, Mari-Liis Kaljusto, John-Peder Escobar Kvitting, Anna Kostareva, Jarle Vaage, Arkady Rutkovskiy
Isabella dos Santos Alves, Carlos Augusto Kalva-Filho, Rodrigo Aquino, Leonardo Travitzki, Alessandro Tosim, Marcelo Papoti, M árcio Pereira Morato
Ma ëlle Wirth, Aurélie Naud, Emmanuelle Schmitt, Isabelle Clerc-Urmès, Jean-Michel Hascoët