The Impact of age and outcomes of high-risk patients on carotid revascularization
CONCLUSIONS: In patients older than 75 years in the Hr group, there were relatively poor 30-day treatment outcomes in both CEA and CAS. Alternative treatment is needed that can expect better outcomes in older high-risk patients. In the Nr group, CEA has a significant benefit compared with CAS, and CEA should be recommended more to these patients.PMID:36794829 | DOI:10.1177/17085381231155035
Source: Vascular - Category: Surgery Authors: Joon-Kee Park Shin-Young Woo Yang-Jin Park Dong-Ik Kim Gyeong-Moon Kim Woo-Keun Seo Jong-Won Jung Pyoung Jeon Keon-Ha Kim Young-Wook Kim Shin-Seok Yang Source Type: research
More News: Cardiology | Cardiovascular | Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery | Carotid Endarterectomy | Databases & Libraries | Heart | Stroke | Surgery