Health effects related to exposure of static magnetic fields and acoustic noise —comparison between MR and CT radiographers

ConclusionNo significant differences in symptom prevalence were seen between MR and CT radiographers. However, working at 3T increased the risk of SMF symptoms, and stress increased adverse health effects. Noise nuisance was considered more problematic by CT than MR personnel.Key Points•No significant differences in symptom prevalence were seen between MR and CT radiographers.•Working at ≥ 3 T doubled the odds of experiencing SMF symptoms (vertigo/dizziness, nausea, metallic taste, and/or illusion of movement) as compared to working exclusively at ≤ 1.5 T.•Work-related acoustic noise was less well mitigated and was rated as more troublesome by CT personnel than by MR personnel.
Source: European Radiology - Category: Radiology Source Type: research